Scientific studies have yet
to draw a clear picture of why women lose their ability to have children at
around age 50. But now a research has suggests that, competition for resources
between older women and their daughter-in-laws may have had something to do
with it.
The researchers hoped to
explain why women lose the ability to reproduce at about the same time their
children start to make their own families. They postulated that humans might in
part have evolved this strategy in order to decrease competition between
generations of reproducing women in one family and increase child survival in
times when resources for childrearing were scarce.
Previous research had hinted
that competition for resources, such as food, time and help with childcare
between generations living under the same roof may have been a key factor in
the evolution of menopause. “This study measure how intergenerational
reproductive conflict between in-laws may have shaped menopause,” said Stephen
Stearns, an evolutionary biologist at Yale University.
Researchers looked at birth
and death rates from a 200-year dataset obtained from records kept by the
Lutheran Church of Finland between 1702 and 1908. Overall, they found that
beyond about age 51, the negatives outweigh the positives of reproducing for
women. Reduced competition between the older women and their daughters-in-law,
along with childcare provided for grandchildren, may explain the benefits of
“menopause” here.
In fact, more often during
this time period, mothers and daughters-in-law lived under the same roof and
thus shared the same resources, according to Virpi Lummaa, an evolutionary
biologist and study author. Daughters, however, typically married off and moved
to live with a husband and his family.
While supporting their idea
further, the researchers found that children born to older woman who were
pregnant at the same time as a daughter-in-law were 50 percent less likely to
survive to age 15. Meanwhile, children born to younger women pregnant at the
same time as a mother-in-law, were 66 percent less likely to survive to
adolescence. The researchers suggest competition for resources may explain this
dip in offspring survival.
However, simultaneous
pregnancies between mothers and daughters had no significant effect on child
survival.
Though the findings are
significant, it is hard to say how well these 200 years in Finland represent the conditions
under which menopause may have evolved, said Stearns. Humans likely evolved in
family groups of nomadic hunter-gatherers.
Reproductive conflict alone
doesn’t explain how menopause evolved, according to the authors. Other
theories, such as the mother and grandmother hypotheses likely also played a
role.
The mother hypothesis states
that as women get older, they are more likely to experience complications in
childbirth and less likely to survive long enough to raise a child to
independence, while the grandmother hypothesis says that given the costs of
late-life pregnancy and child rearing, a woman may benefit from forgoing future
pregnancies, instead helping to increase the reproductive success of her
existing children.
“None of these hypotheses
make perfect sense alone, but together they begin to explain the pattern that
we see in nature,” Lummaa said.
No comments:
Post a Comment