An exhibition in Vienna
probes our attitude towards nudity - people in the West have become
accustomed to the naked female form, but male nudes can still shock.
Before the show opened, the museum even covered up parts of its own
posters, saying they had caused public outrage.
Five naked male statues on a pedestal confront you as you enter the new exhibition at the Leopold Museum.
The earliest is Ancient Egyptian, and the most recent a figure based on a shopping mannequin.
Tobias Natter, the director of the Leopold Museum, says the opening display is a "walk through 5,000 years of history".
"You have an old Egyptian nude, which is very unusual for
Egyptian art, you have Roman art, you have Rodin from the 19th and 20th
Century, to a postmodern statue. It tells the visitor the male nude in
art has a very long tradition," he says.
The exhibition features a diverse range of styles, from paintings by
Peter Paul Rubens, Paul Cezanne, Edvard Munch and the expressionist
artist Egon Schiele, to more modern and sexually explicit works by the
US photographer Robert Mapplethorpe and the London-based artists Gilbert
and George.
There are images of erect penises, and of anuses.
Natter says the museum is breaking new ground.
Erich KocinaWe are not used to seeing a penis - I think that is the main problem for people”
"It's quite unusual for an
exhibition to focus on the depiction of the male nude. Surprisingly we
had many exhibitions dealing with the female nude body, but so far never
an exhibition which features the male nude. Somehow it is a taboo.
"On the other hand, we see that the male nude is getting a
new presence in modern contemporary society. He is now on posters, he is
on stages, he is getting more and more normal."
An image of naked woman is still regarded in a very different light from that of a naked man, Natter says.
"We saw with the advertising for our exhibition, there is
still a difference between a female nude body on the poster or a male
nude body. This makes a cultural difference that is still on-going and
needs to be discussed with an exhibition."
One of the posters advertising the exhibit featured a
full-frontal photograph of three naked footballers, by the French
artists Pierre et Gilles. Shortly before the opening last month, the
Leopold Museum said that it had received so many complaints that it had
been forced to take action.
It put a red band covering the intimate parts of the footballers, on some - but not all - of the posters.
A passerby comments on the postersThey are very well-built, they are sportsmen - it's nice to see”
But Vienna is full of posters of
naked or semi-naked women and is also known for its relaxed approach to
nudity at mixed saunas and sunbathing areas. So did the pictures really
cause outrage?
Erich Kocina, from Die Presse newspaper, says the museum
expected to provoke controversy with the posters - but it went beyond
that, causing serious offence to some Viennese.
"It's a mixture - 30% was marketing and 70% was genuine outrage," he says.
"I think we are just used to seeing naked women because they
are used as objects of desire in advertisements and TV. Naked men are
not that common - we are not used to seeing a penis. I think that is the
main problem for people."
Art historian Eva Kernbauer, from the University of Applied
Arts in Vienna, says male nudes have been around for a long time, but
the way nude men and women have been depicted has always differed.
"To put it very simply, male
nudity was closely linked to strength, invulnerability and heroism, the
female nude to beauty and erotics," she says.
"Also, the 'Venus pudica' [the shameful Venus] was already
developed in ancient Greece, so the depictions of female chastity and
female nudity are historically deeply interlinked. The female nude is
not threatening at all - female nudity is vulnerable, because it
acknowledges the gaze of the beholder."
This classical model is still powerful today, she says.
Female nudity is not only omnipresent, it is also unthreatening. Male
nudity is more challenging.
"Male nudity is very often linked to the exposure of sexual
organs - the penis - and this is often done in a way that responds to
the classical model of aggression and strength.
"While the sexual organ in itself does not necessarily have
to appear as threatening or aggressive, the difference from the dominant
model of soft female nudity is great."
Despite a long search throughout Vienna, I can't find anybody deeply outraged by the naked posters.
One man tells me guardedly that he is not "highly appreciative" of the image.
"It's provocative, it's true," says a woman named Eva. "On
the other hand it is looking back to the old days when nakedness was
quite common [in art], so I think we should get used to it."
And others, such as Cecile, a tourist visiting from France, like the nudes.
"They are very well-built, they are sportsmen, it's not like
ugly old men with a big belly, so they are pretty. It's nice to see."
No comments:
Post a Comment