Hon. Okpolupm Ikpong Etteh is the
leader of the Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly in an interview with TONY ANICHEBE in Uyo.... Speaks on Zoning of Governorship in the State Ahead of 2015, Governor Godswill Akpabio’s donations,
among other issues Excerpts:
What is your position on zoning which has dominated 2015 governorship
election in Akwa Ibom?
Since the creation of Akwa Ibom, there has always been zoning. With the
emergence of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in 1999, Victor Attah from Uyo
Senatorial District became the governor, and from 2007 till date, Godswill
Akpabio from Ikot Ekpene Senatorial District has been the governor. That is to
show you that there is zoning, whether written or unwritten; Akpabio is not
from the same senatorial district with Attah. Akpabio came from Ikot Ekpene
while Attah came from Uyo, meaning that two senatorial districts have occupied
that office. Whether there is zoning or not, it is one senatorial district that
is left to occupy the governorship seat.
The zoning of political offices is the strength of PDP as a party.
Zoning or rotation is enshrined in PDP constitution whether it is written or
not. Take for instance, when Attah was governor for eight years, the deputy
governor came from Ikot Ekpene Senatorial District, the Speaker emerged from
Eket Senatorial District.
The party chairman came from Eket Senatorial
District, the secretary of the party came from Uyo Senatorial District while
the deputy chairman came from Ikot Ekpene Senatorial District. Is that not
zoning? There is no written document that says it will go that way; it is a
convention by ratification. Today the governor is from Uyo Senatorial District,
the deputy governor from Eket Senatorial District and the Speaker of the House
of Assembly and chairman of the party is from Uyo Senatorial District. Do we
have any written document that says those offices should rotate that way? No,
it is because we are PDP and PDP believes in zoning as enshrined in the party.
In as much as you are a member of PDP, there is zoning. Every true PDP member
believes there is zoning in PDP.
Okay let us leave the word zoning and call it rotation. Some people
don’t like the word zoning. For instance, the first person who represented my
constituency in 1999 was Bassey Essien from Esit Eket and today I am the
Assembly member from Ibeno. After my tenure, it reverts to Esit Eket and that
is the rotation, there is no written agreement on the movement of the seat,
everybody knows it’s going there because I will no longer contest for that
office. The word zoning is embedded in PDP, there is no argument about that,
the moment President Goodluck Jonathan says he is no more interested in the
presidency, automatically the seat moves, but he has a right to contest again
because he is in his first term.
As a card-carrying and founding member of the PDP in my ward since
1998, I will tell you that there is zoning in PDP. We don’t need any document
to prove there is zoning. If any member of the PDP says there is no zoning from
one ward to another and one constituency or district to another, that person is
not a member of PDP because if the person was a member of the party from 1998
and followed the records and proceedings of the party, he or she will know
there is rotation or zoning and will not argue about it. It is incumbent on PDP
to know that two out of three have taken their slots for governorship remaining
one, so it is not issue for debate for justice and equity sake.
There is also an argument that the rotation of the governorship should
be based on ethnicity in that the state is sitting on a tripod of Ibibio,
Annang and Oron ethnic groups. Do you share this view?
I am the leader of the Akwa Ibom State House of Assembly and I
represent the PDP in the Assembly. The PDP of which I am a card-carrying member
does not recognise ethnic groups. So, in the context of zoning or rotation, the
PDP constitution recognises the senatorial district. So the issue of Annang,
Ibibio, Oron, Obolo is no issue when it comes to the norms in PDP as a party.
The party cannot include the over 300 tribes in the country into its
constitution.
President Jonathan is not Nigerian president because he’s an Ijaw man
but because he is from South-South. So, what am saying is that zoning of
governorship does not follow ethnic nationalities but the senatorial districts.
How do you see the emergence of Governor Akpabio as chairman, PDP
Governors’ Forum?
For me as the leader of the House of Assembly and member representing
Esit Eket /Ibeno state constituency in the state Assembly, Akpabio’s emergence
as chairman PDP Governor’s forum is a big-plus for Akwa Ibom State. This means
that Akwa Ibom is working. PDP and its governors’ forum cannot appoint someone
without a track record to lead them. The party’s leaders, stakeholders and
Board of Trustees (BoT) must have sat down, look at his track record of
performance before settling for him. They also know that he has the capacity to
lead; he has the energy to work tirelessly to ensure there is peace and
cohesion in the party. This is one appointment done on merit. The position
again is a recognition of what Akwa Ibom State has offered PDP, because this is
one state that is committed to the party. If you want to look at the
performance of PDP in Nigeria, Akwa Ibom is a case study.
Criticisms have trailed Governor Akpabio recently over his donations to
individuals and groups. Were these donations captured in the state budget?
As far as I am concerned, monies are budgeted to office of the
governor; the governor has security vote and administrative money. Has anybody
in this country asked the President how he spends his security vote? This is
because security matter is one that is not discussed openly. The governor has
salary and hospitality votes to run his office; there is room for miscellaneous
expenses and Governor’s Office administration.
There is provision in the state
budget, allocating money to the office of the governor. So, whatever money the
governor spends is allocated to the office of the governor. We can only say the
governor did not spend the money well if the report from the House Committee on
Public Accounts indicts the governor or if the Auditor General sends in its
annual report that the governor has misappropriated funds, that is when the
public account will invite the governor to come and explain. But if you have
looked at all the budgets passed and reports on implementation from the office
of the Auditor General, there is no indictment of the office of the governor
that he has misappropriated funds.
So, what people are saying is not correct, the governor has salary and
many other subheads to spend money. To me there is nothing wrong with what the
governor has done so far.
The state Assembly has just approved a $500 million (N80 billion) loan
for the governor. It was said that the Houes was divided before it was passed.
What really happened?
When the proposal came from the executive to the legislature, it was
our duty to find out why he needs the money; it is not enough to read the
governor’s letter and approve. That was why the House decided to summon the
Commissioner for Finance, Commissioner for Economic Development and the
Permanent Secretary, Budget Office to come and explain the merits and demerits
of taking this loan, because we have earlier ratified the governor’s request
for N50 billion. since his inauguration as governor in 2007 he has never gone
to any bank for loan and from that year we have been having provision for N50
billion loan in the state budget.
So, with the magnitude of ongoing jobs, we
granted the governor the approval to get the first loan of N50 billion from a
local bank with 18 per cent interest and the government came back and said that
the interest on the loan is so much and that the state may not be able to pay
before May 2015 and that we have a better offer from an international bank with
single digit interest rate of less than nine per cent. What they wanted to do
was to use the already approved funds provided in two initials budgets of 2012
and 2013 in which provisions were made for N40 billion loan each totalling N80
billion. So, for us at the Assembly we saw that as the best for the state. It
is a good deal for Akwa Ibom State and there is no division among the lawmakers
on this.
There appears to be peace in the state Assembly after a recent crisis
that threatens to sack the Speaker. How do you achieve this stability?
As far as I am concerned, there is no crisis in the House ever since we
came on board. From June 2011 till date, we have been in peace and the Assembly
has been peaceful. If there is crisis, I will tell you as the Leader of the
House. What you hear are rumours and speculations, people don’t believe we can
stay together for two years without crisis. They call us rubber stamp because
we work harmoniously with the executive. The government seeks and obtains the
House approval before undertaking any major projects and these accounts for the
harmony and peace between both arms of government.
No comments:
Post a Comment