Once upon a time, an animation studio known as the Walt Disney
Company cast a magical spell, allowing it to seize control of the fairy
tale kingdom and grow into a multinational mass media corporation to
dwarf Jack’s beanstalk. Ever since, generations of kids the world over
have been raised on animated versions of stories that for centuries
weren’t even written down, let alone accoutred with costly merchandise.
Maleficent is the latest in a long line of fantasy adaptations.
Hephzibah Anderson looks at their dark, sexual messages – and why we’re
fascinated by them.
Maleficent,
Disney’s latest bid for box office gold, seeks to restore some of the
darkness to Sleeping Beauty’s story. With a budget in excess of $175m,
the live-action makeover features Angelina Jolie as the badass fairy
whose nefariousness is hammered home via horns, vampiric robes and
prosthetically enhanced cheekbones that could cut glass. It’s from the
viewpoint of this alluringly villainous anti-heroine that the narrative
is retold, describing how a pure heart gets turned to stone by a harsh
betrayal.
Fairy tales began as oral folk stories. They were, maven
Jack Zipes notes in his essay Breaking the Disney Spell, “tales of
initiation, worship, warning and indoctrination.” As such, they’re
characterised by a surface simplicity. They are pure story, unhindered
by descriptive passages or interior monologues, and peopled by
characters who can seem decidedly one dimensional. The good are good and
the bad, bad. Their imagery tends to be unsophisticated, their
descriptions almost bland: forests are deep, princesses are beautiful
and so on. To quote Philip Pullman, writing in The Guardian about his endeavour to retell some of the most popular, “there is no psychology in a fairy tale.”
Tell
that to Freud or Jung. There may be no explicit psychology, but peer a
little closer and their psychological traits become as hard to ignore as
Pinocchio’s schnozzle. Just think of the way mirrors are used to
reflect their viewers’ inner selves, as in Snow White, or the use of
dream states like Sleeping Beauty’s.
Sexual symbols
And that’s barely the
beginning where this particular story is concerned. The virginal
princess, the pinprick of blood, the thorny briar hedge that springs up
around her and blooms for the prince: it positively oozes psychological
symbolism. If the spindle symbolises penetration, then the spilled blood
suggests menstruation and the bush is, well, a vagina. A vagina with
teeth, no less, that will emasculate any prince who tries to breach it
too hastily.
The stories that are best known today were collected
and set down by enthusiasts like the Brothers Grimm, ETA Hoffman and
Hans Christian Andersen. In so doing, they codified tales that had
always been in flux, passing from teller to teller, acquiring and losing
details as in a game of telephone. But once they existed in written
form, they became texts that scholars could parse, and for Freud and
Jung, they were as productive as the goose that lay the golden eggs.
Both
men had their theories as to why these narratives resonate so
profoundly in the human psyche. For Jung, their characters are
archetypes, and the reason they might seem one-dimensional is that they
each represent different facets of our personalities. For Freud, fairy
tales stemmed from the same place as dreams, and motifs like forests and
thorns indicated repressed desires and wish-fulfilment fantasies. Freud
being Freud, these are frequently sexual in nature.
His thinking
strongly influenced psychoanalytic theorist Bruno Bettelheim, whose book
The Uses of Enchantment became a hit in the late 1970s. In it, he
describes how the forest in The Two Brothers “symbolizes the place in
which inner darkness is confronted and worked through; where uncertainty
is resolved about who one is; and where one begins to understand who
one wants to be. Since ancient times the near impenetrable forest in
which we get lost has symbolized the dark, hidden, near-impenetrable
world of our unconscious.”
Bettelheim, who also found Oedipus and
Electra complexes in Snow White and Sleeping Beauty, suggested that Jack
and the Beanstalk was about masturbation, and saw penis envy and
castration anxiety spotlighted in Cinderella.
Since his suicide in 1990, former patients’ accusations of
physical and psychological abuse have cast a shadow over Bettelheim’s
views but fairy tales remain popular in psychoanalytic circles, where
shape-shifting – transformations from frog to prince or from girl to
bird – is cast as an allusion to multiple personality disorder, and the
impossible tasks that protagonists face – spinning gold from straw, say –
as examples of the double-binding found in dysfunctional families. And
that’s to say nothing of fairy tales’ daddy figures, who are
ineffectual, ogreish or merely absent.
Never-ending stories
Adaptability
is one of the fairy tale’s secrets of survival and there are feminist
readings (Beauty and the Beast is a parable about women’s self-sacrifice
in a patriarchal society), Marxist readings (Snow White’s seven dwarves
epitomise the peasant classes, surviving by dint of hard work and
solidarity), even Nazi propaganda readings (the prince must wake the
sleeping Aryan beauty from the dense hedge of Jewish and Communist
conspiracies). But it is definitely possible to do too much delving,
which is why it’s refreshing to see these time-worn tales used as a
jumping off point for new stories, of which Maleficent is just the
latest. Earlier this year, Helen Oyeyemi, one of Granta’s Best Young
British Novelists, retold Snow White in her mischievous fifth novel,
Boy, Snow, Bird, braiding themes of race, gender and ethnicity without
sacrificing any of the magic that we associate with the form.
Meanwhile,
Michael Cunningham, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Hours,
references Hans Christian Andersen in the title of his new novel, The
Ice Queen, which is all about a struggling musician, his gay brother and
his dying girlfriend. His next book, due to be released next year, is a
collection of short stories that retell fairy tales.
“They’re various but the overriding notion is, what was really
going on there? Those of us who were raised on the Disney versions are
sometimes shocked to see the kind of murder and mayhem that was excised
from the animated stuff. Fairy tales are dark and intense and strange,”
Cunningham tells me.
If returning to the originals can be
disturbing, the sources that inspired them should probably come with
trigger warnings. It’s Charles Perrault who is responsible for much of
what we know about Sleeping Beauty, but he drew in turn on an Italian
tale called Sun, Moon and Talia, in which a fair maiden falls into such a
deep sleep that a passing king rapes her and impregnates her with twins
to whom she gives birth, all without waking. She’s roused only when one
of the infants accidentally suckles on her finger rather than her
breast. It’s enough to put a hapless reader into therapy.
No comments:
Post a Comment