Job applicants might not want to
wear their religion on their sleeves. At least that’s the message that could be
taken from a growing number of studies that show religious discrimination often
plays a significant role in the hiring process.
In the most extensive studies to
date, researchers found that otherwise identical fictitious resumes listing
membership in student religious organizations received fewer responses from US
employers than those with no mention of religion. The prejudice was stronger in
southern states than in New England states, where there is greater diversity of
religions and people tend to be more tolerant of other faiths.
“There has
been a privatisation of religion,” said Michael Wallace, a sociology professor
at the University of Connecticut and co-author of the recently published
studies. “We’re perfectly willing to acknowledge the right to religious
freedom, but we prefer that religion not be present in public places like
schools or workplaces, where there will likely be people with diverse religious
beliefs.”
Employers
may harbour personal prejudices against certain faiths. They also could fear
that people who decide to reveal their religious beliefs — or their atheism —
on resumes are more likely to discuss religion and potentially clash with
co-workers.
“The religious aspect of the resume may jump out to recruiters and raise the
questions of whether such people will disrespect others with a different
religious identity — or no religious beliefs at all,” Wallace said.
Religious affiliation, however,
could work in an applicant’s favor in some cases. In the study of southern
states, Jews actually seemed to have an edge over other applicants. What’s
more, religious organizations in the US are allowed to give employment
preference to members of their own faith.
But business owners who apply their
personal religious beliefs to their companies’ policies would rarely be allowed
to show hiring preference to people of their own faith. The exception would be
when religion “is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary
[for the company’s] normal operation,” according to the US Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
That means Hobby Lobby, which the
US Supreme Court recently ruled could deny insurance coverage for some female
contraceptives because of its owners’ Christian beliefs, probably couldn’t
favour Christians in its recruiting. The company runs a chain of arts and
crafts stores, where an employee’s religious beliefs would be unlikely to
affect business operations. However, companies like Hobby Lobby might try to
use their religious beliefs to justify discrimination against gay, lesbian and
transgender job candidates.
Studies in France and Greece have
found hiring bias for certain religious groups. The French research revealed
that a Muslim with African heritage was two-and-a-half times less likely to get
called for a job interview in France than an equally qualified
Christian with the same ethnic background.
“We find a good deal of evidence
that [people] in Christian heritage societies, although themselves secular —
and many of them self-declared atheists — see Muslims as presenting a set of
cultural norms that are threatening to them,” said David Laitin, a political
science professor at Stanford University and one of the authors of the study.
BY
No comments:
Post a Comment