Rome — Wealthy countries are still subsidising their farmers at the
expense of developing nations, undermining market access for some of the world's
poorest producers, two farm ministers told a Food and Agriculture Organization
meeting on Monday.
"Our cotton producers are constantly targeted by unfair subsidies
from the North," Burkina Faso Agriculture Minister Mahama Zoungrana told
delegates at a meeting of the U.N. agency in Rome.
"The rules and standards of international trade are not favorable
to SMEs (small and medium sized enterprises) from Africa," he said.
Georgian Agriculture Minister Otar Danelia echoed that concern. "I
believe a global approach is needed to deal with farm subsidies," he told
delegates at the FAO Ministerial Meeting on Governance and International
Commodity Markets. "They (subsidies) create imbalances."
The United States, the world's largest cotton producer, paid its cotton
farmers $32.9 billion to grow their crops between 1995 and 2012, the Environmental Working Group, a research organisation,
reported.
"U.S. farmers are subsidised so they produce more cotton than they
would otherwise, lowering the global price and hurting farmers in Burkina
Faso," Gawain Kripke, Oxfam America's director of research, told the
Thomson Reuters Foundation. "This creates unfair global competition."
European cotton producers, based mostly in Greece and Spain, receive
smaller subsidies, but the EU accounts for only one
percent of world production, EU figures show.
For other crops, the European Union spends around $58 billion annually
on farm subsidies. Farmers from poorer countries say they cannot compete, given
these levels of government support for their rivals.
Members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
spent a total of $258 billion subsidising agriculture in 2013, OECD data show.
Asked whether rich-world subsidies unbalance agricultural markets,
David Hallam, director of the FAO trade and markets division, told the Thomson
Reuters Foundation "there is still scope to improve" global rules
governing subsidies. The World Trade Organisation (WTO) has the task of
arbitrating disputes on such issues, he said.
Brazil has tried to use the WTO in its dispute with the United States
over cotton subsidies.
In 2004, Brazil won a challenge against U.S. cotton farmers when the WTO backed its complaint and allowed it to impose $830
million in sanctions on U.S. products. The two governments are still wrangling
over the specifics of a payout, and South America's largest economy has
threatened to impose higher import tariffs on U.S. products if a deal isn't
reached.
Disputes between India and the United States over farm subsidies have
been partly responsible for stalling global trade pacts.
Concerns over developed-world farm subsidies took a back seat for
policy makers in recent years, as high prices for agricultural goods led to
food riots and worries that a growing number of people in poor countries
couldn't afford to eat.
Today, plentiful harvests have pushed down prices, putting concerns
over subsidies back on the table.
"Disfunction in commodity markets is a threat to security,
worldwide," said Burkina Faso's Zoungrana.
By Chris Arsenault
No comments:
Post a Comment