meat |
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer
research agency of the World Health Organization, says it has found
“sufficient evidence” that consumption of processed meat causes colorectal cancer in humans.
The agency announced in a statement Monday October 26, 2015, that it
has classified processed meat “carcinogenic to humans” after a team of
researchers concluded that each 50 gram portion of processed meat eaten
daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18 per cent.
The agency whose mission is to coordinate and conduct research on
human cancer, has also classified red meat as “probably carcinogenic to
humans” based on “limited evidence” that its consumption causes cancer
in humans.
The 22 researchers, drawn from 10 countries under the IARC
Monographs, a research publication of the IARC, found an association
between processed meat
and cancer of the colon and rectum – the lower parts of the large
intestine, and less stronger associations with pancreatic cancer and
prostate cancer.
The IARC says the team examined more than 800 studies conducted across the world, on associations between red meat or processed meat, and more than 12 types of cancer.
Processed meat,
the IARC explained, refers to meat that has been transformed to
preserve it and includes meat products such as sausages, hot dogs,
corned beef, beef jerky and canned meat.
“For an individual, the risk of developing colorectal cancer because of their consumption of processed
meat remains small, but this risk increases with the amount of meat
consumed”, Dr Kurt Straif, Head of the IARC Monographs Programme said.
The IARC says now that the results would be central to risk
assessments by governments and international regulatory agencies to find
a balance between the risks and the nutritional benefits of eating red
meat.
In a reaction to the IARC’s announcement, the North American Meat
Institute (NAMI) described the panel’s conclusion as “dramatic and
alarmist”, saying that it defies common sense and the numerous studies
that show no association between meat and cancer as well as those that
show that meat has health benefits.
A statement issued by the Institute argued that cancer is “a complex
disease not caused by single foods” and the theoretical hazard found is
not enough to draw conclusions. especially as sunlight, wine, coffee,
aloe vera and grilled food are among the 940 agents that have been found
to be hazardous by IARC.
“IARC’s decision simply cannot be applied to people’s health because
it considers just one piece of the health puzzle: theoretical hazards.
Risks and benefits must be considered together before telling people
what to eat, drink, drive, breathe, or where to work,” Dr Betsy Booren,
NAMI’s Vice President of Scientific Affairs said
She also accused the panel, saying that “they tortured the data to
ensure a specific outcome” without giving room for mediating elements.
By Emmanuel Odonkor
No comments:
Post a Comment