Publisher Trinity Mirror said it was "disappointing" but circulation for the title was "below our expectations".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/057cf/057cf8ecba4f7db4e9f3450418722a22715fd732" alt=""
Editor
Alison Phillips said "we tried everything we could", getting a great
reaction from readers, "but the reality was we didn't have enough of
them".
It had hoped to sell about 200,000 copies a day, but sales are reported to have fallen to about 40,000.
The majority of the newspaper's 25 staff will lose their jobs, with the remainder being absorbed by the Mirror newspaper.
The
paper was launched in February and was said to be politically neutral
and aimed at "time-poor" readers. Although the title had a social media
presence, it did not have a website.
'Took a chance'
Ms Phillips, former editor of the Mirror's weekend edition, wrote on Facebook: "The response over the 50 issues we have published has been extraordinary.
"I
have never worked on a title with such engagement from readers. There
clearly were many people who truly loved the idea of a different kind of
newspaper which spoke to them. But the reality was we didn't have
enough of them on a daily basis."
She
also praised the team for "their hard work and commitment but also for
having the guts to take a chance and to try something new when they knew
there were few guarantees of success".
She added: "To have not
given this a go was to mean we were content to stand on the pavement and
watch the decline of British national newspapers hurtle past us. But we
weren't. And we still aren't."
Two million copies were distributed free on launch day. It then cost 25p for the first two weeks, before rising to 50p.
In
its trading update Trinity said: "Although the New Day has received
many supportive reviews and built a strong following on Facebook, the
circulation for the title is below our expectations.
"Whilst
disappointing, the launch and subsequent closure have provided new
insights into enhancing our newspapers and a number of these
opportunities will be considered over time."
At launch the
company reported a £14.4m fall in annual pre-tax profit to £67.2m. Its
share price rose by more than 7% on the news of the closure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/571d5/571d5a179aa450587a6f47180a56fbdeda15198f" alt=""
Jane Martinson, head of media at the Guardian, said it showed that "this is a terrible time to launch a newspaper".
"We
have to welcome a brave and optimistic attempt to do something in this
market. Was it ill-conceived though? I would say yes."
She said she believed the pricing was wrong and it did not give readers enough news.
The
New Day was the first new national paper since the launch of i, a
slimmed-down version of the Independent, which went on sale in October
2010.
However, its impending closure comes just over a month after
the Independent and Independent on Sunday ceased as print editions to
concentrate on online publishing.
Amol Rajan, editor-at-large at
the Independent, said he felt sympathetic for the people who worked at
the paper but it was the right decision to close.
"If it's not working, it's better to pull out quickly rather than lingering on," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
"The
New Day was not a news-led product - it was a features-led product. In
that way it was unique but it was not a compelling proposition."
No comments:
Post a Comment