Children learn social interaction lessons better from stories with
humans as the main focus versus those with critter characters, according
to a recent report published in the journal Developmental Science.
“Contrary to the common belief,
realistic stories, not anthropomorphic
ones, are better for promoting young children’s prosocial behavior,” the
authors noted in the report.
The Toronto-based study focused on 96 children, ages four to six, who
were read a story about sharing. Some were read the story with human
characters as the protagonists, while other children heard the same
story but with animal characters.
Before story time, the children were asked to choose 10 stickers to
take home, then told that another child their gender and age wasn’t
chosen for the activity and therefore could not get any stickers. The
kids were then given a chance to share their stickers with their peer in
secret.
After the story, the children were given another 10 stickers and again told they could share them if they wanted.
Kids who’d heard the story featuring human characters shared their
stickers more than the kids who heard the tale starring animal
characters or a study control story about seeds.
“For stories with anthropomorphized animal characters, many children
may find them not to be relatable and thus not act according to the
moral of the story,” the study said.
In fact, the children who read the human story shared their second
round of stickers more than they did the first round, while the kids who
read the animal or seeds story shared significantly less. This could be
because of the natural thought that they’d shared already.
“The human story clearly helped the children not only to overcome this
general tendency to decrease prosocial giving the second time, but also
to increase it significantly after having given prosocially once
already,” the study stated.
No comments:
Post a Comment