Eskom this week starts the disciplinary process against suspended
executive Matshela Koko, but irregular interventions by its board may
ensure that it delivers an outcome favourable to the accused.
The board asked Koko to choose the presiding officer.
Then Eskom
contracted lawyer Sebetja Matsaung to lead evidence, despite its legal
head advising against this because he was "too junior, inexperienced and
does not have the expertise".
Through his lawyers, Koko was asked to "elect one name from a list of
three" possible presiding officers — all senior and experienced
advocates. Asger Gani attorneys rejected them on September 5 on the
grounds that they were white men.
If you are already a subscriber, please click on the following link below to go to the full article: Hearing tailored to favour Eskom’s Koko
businesslive
No comments:
Post a Comment