When
a patient has a colonoscopy, a thin flexible tube is inserted into
their anus, and passed up their rectum into the colon. This allows the
doctor to examine the inner lining of their large intestine for tumors
or areas of inflammation. After my mother had this procedure a couple of
years ago, she was left wondering why any doctor would choose to spend
their time looking inside a patient’s intestines. "What could possibly
be the attraction of gastro-enterology?" she asked.
I suspect
that my mother wasn’t alone in having these thoughts. It is
probably not unusual for patients to ponder why their doctor has ended
up treating a particular part of the body – especially when that
doctor’s work involves examining parts of the body associated with
excretion, or carrying out tasks that cause their patients pain and
distress.
If you took this one step further and asked a group of patients with
cancer why they thought the doctors treating them had chosen oncology,
or asked patients with multiple sclerosis why their doctors had chosen
neurology, I imagine that they would come up with some sensible answers.
Drawing on their own experience of choosing their careers, patients
would probably suggest that these doctors had opted for their particular
specialties because they had enjoyed studying these subjects at medical
school or they had been influenced by senior clinicians who had
encouraged them to train as oncologists, neurologists, or whatever. And
these patients would be correct, as research has identified both these
factors as being important.
What remains much more hidden, however, from both patients and the
doctors themselves, are the ways in which the landmark events of our
lives (illnesses, deaths, divorces) together with the dynamics of the
family that we grew up in (relationships with parents,
grandparents, siblings) pattern the choices that we make about work.
And this doesn’t just apply to doctors. It applies to everybody who has
even the smallest element of choice in the what, how, and where of their
working lives.
Work is an outlet for our hopes, dreams,
regrets, and fears. We see this most clearly with creative artists:
Frida Kahlo’s paintings of her recurrent miscarriages; Eduard Munch’s
"The Scream" depicting his terror of falling prey to the mental illness
that debilitated his sister; Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar recounting her own experience as a psychiatric
patient. Artists of all media express their central emotional dilemmas,
through their work. But this process isn’t confined to artists;
although not everyone can draw, or paint or write, we all use our work,
to give voice to the emotional undercurrents that define us.
I once had a client who qualified as a careers counselor and got a
job working in a university careers service. A few months into his first
job, he decided that he was more interested in helping students sort
out serious debt issues than assisting them with their career
decisions; with no particular training, he switched to working as a
student debt adviser. The client had previously told me about the
difficult relationship he had with his father. But this job change made
much greater sense to me when he later confided that in addition to
running a small shop, his father also worked as a money lender, making a
considerable amount of money through this activity. Although my client
hadn’t consciously made the link, opting for work that involved helping
people who were in serious debt could be seen as a reparative act. The
father made money by charging interest on loans. The son tried to help
people who fell into debt.
It is extraordinary to see how echoes from childhood can be discerned in the career decisions that everybody takes—and this includes doctors. So in my new book, Also Human,
there’s a chapter that looks at the influence of childhood events on
the particular specialties that doctors choose. For example, I describe a
client who decided to go to medical school immediately after the death
of his sister from leukemia. Even though the doctor treating his sister
advised him that it was too soon to make this decision, he still went
ahead. Right from the start of medical school, this individual only ever
considered one specialty – obstetrics. And despite the fact that he
found the unpredictable nature
of the delivery room unbelievably stressful, he continued for many
years. In the sessions we had together he came to see that his choice of
obstetrics represented an unconscious
desire to bring new life into the world – a desire which stemmed from
the overwhelming tragedy of losing his sister at a young age. While this
might have worked out, in his particular case, his overwhelming motivation to replace loss with new life meant that he overlooked the fundamental ways in which he was unsuited to working in obstetrics.
This is just one example of many but it illustrates the fact that doctors, just like their patients, are also human.
AUTHOR
Caroline Elton, Ph.D.,
is a chartered psychologist with dual registration in occupational and
counselling psychology. She is the author of Also Human: The Inner Lives
of Doctors.
No comments:
Post a Comment