A former President, Chief Olusegun
Obasanjo, has appealed against the order given by a Federal Capital
Territory High Court judge, Justice Valentine Ashi, that security
agents, including the police and men of the Department of State Service,
should confiscate his latest autobiography, My Watch.
The judge had given this order after the
ex-president went ahead on Tuesday in Lagos to present the book to the
public, in disobedience to the court’s restraining injunction.
Justice Ashi also gave the former
president a 21-day ultimatum to explain why he should not be punished
for flouting the court order.
However, Obasanjo, in his appeal, argued
that he was in no way “daring the court” as widely reported by some
national newspapers, describing such publication as misleading.
The Chairman, Mobilisation and
Organisation Committee, the Peoples Democratic Party, South West, Mr.
Buruji Kashamu, had instituted a legal action against some sections of
the book.
Obasanjo had, through his legal team,
led by Gboyega Oyewole, filed an appeal challenging the confiscation
order, citing 10 grounds to support the appeal and arguing that the
trial judge erred in his ruling.
In the appeal with suit no. CV/472/14,
filed in a Federal High Court, Abuja, a copy of which was made available
to journalists in Abeokuta, the former president’s counsel contended
that his client was dissatisfied with the ruling of the High Court and
“appealed against the said ruling upon the ground set forth…”
He said, “The learned trial judge erred
in law when he granted the interlocutory order of injunction, which
inter alia restrained the defendant from the publication of his book “My
Watch” or the content of the letter to the President, which is the
subject of the suit before the trial judge in the said book.
“There was uncontradicted affidavit
evidence that the defendant’s book, “My Watch” had been published and
released to the public before the making of the interlocutory order.
“The plaintiff never alluded to this
fact in his affidavit before the court. It is settled law that an
injunction does not lie to restrain a completed act. His Lordship failed
and/or neglected to allude to the affidavit evidence before making the
interlocutory order.
“The learned trial judge erred in law
and exercised his discretion wrongfully in granting the order of
interlocutory injunction, subject of this appeal against the defendant,
restraining him from publishing his book, “My Watch” or publishing his
letter subject of the suit in the said book.”
Meanwhile, one of the aides of Obasanjo
at the Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library, Abeokuta, Mr. Vitalise
Ortese, on Thursday exonerated his principal from deliberately flouting a
court order.
In a statement he signed, Ortese said
since the news of the said order broke, he (Obasanjo) had been receiving
calls from concerned friends far and near and he was constrained to
make this release and present the facts as they relate to the book and
its public presentation.
Ortese said, “Chief Olusegun Obasanjo
wishes to state that the media reports which convey the impression that
he intended to ‘dare or confront a judge or the judiciary’ is highly
misleading.
“Far from this; on the contrary, the
former president is a law abiding citizen, who will only pursue his
rights within the law and will not “‘dare” a judge or knowingly flout an
order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
“The former President wishes to make it
clear that in the first instance, no formal order from Justice Ashi was
served and received by either himself or by proxy regarding any
injunction restraining the publication of the book, “My Watch,” which
from the records was already in circulation.”
No comments:
Post a Comment