The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Monday re-arraigned a
former governor of Bayelsa State, Mr. Timipre Sylva, before a Federal High
Court in Abuja for fraud involving about N2.45bn.
The accused allegedly committed the offence between October 2009 and
February 2010 as governor of Bayelsa State.
He pleaded not guilty to all the six counts when he was re-arraigned
before Justice Evoh Chukwu on Monday.
The former governor also has similar charges pending against him before
Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court in Abuja.
Sylva had earlier pleaded not guilty to Monday’s six counts when he was
first arraigned for the offences before Justice Adamu Bello (retd.) on June 5,
2012.
The matter had to start de novo (afresh) following the
retirement of Justice Bello, a development which prompted Sylva’s
re-arraignment before Justice Chukwu on Monday.
The prosecuting counsel, Mr. Festus Keyamo, who signed the charges,
accused Sylva of offences, including conversion of various sums of money
belonging to the state with the aim of concealing their illicit origins.
Sylva was accused of knowing the illegal sources of the money and
allegedly converted the funds through the bank accounts of a Bureau de Change
operator, a company and other individuals in order to conceal their illicit
origin.
He was also accused of inducing Union Bank Plc to fraudulently grant
him N2bn overdraft facility under the pretext of using the money to augment
workers’ salary.
He allegedly committed the offences in conspiracy with other unnamed
persons said to be at large.
In the first count, the EFCC alleged that between October 2009 and
February 2010, the former governor conspired with other unnamed persons to
convert “property and resources amounting to N2bn belonging to Bayelsa State
Government, derived from an illegal act with the aim of concealing the illicit
origin of the said amount. ”
In the second count, the EFCC alleged that on January 22, 2010, Sylva
converted a sum of N380m, property of Bayelsa State Government, “through the
account of one Habibu Sani Maigidia, a Bureau de Change operator with Account
No. 221433478108 in Fin Bank Plc, which sum you knew represented the proceeds
of an illegal act with the aim of concealing the nature of the proceeds of the
said illegal act.”
The third count accused the former governor of converting N50m
belonging to his state “through the account of one Enson Benmer Limited with
Account No. 6152030001946 in First Bank Plc, which sum you knew represented the
proceeds of an illegal act with the aim of concealing the nature of the proceeds
of the said illegal act. ”
The fourth count alleged that the accused, on January 5, 2010,
converted the sum of N20m belonging to Bayelsa State, “through the account of
one John Daukoru, with Account No. 04800250000418 in United Bank of Africa Plc,
which sum you knew represented the proceeds of an illegal act with the aim of
concealing the nature of the proceeds of the said illegal act.”
EFCC said the offence in the first count is contrary to provisions of
section 17(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition Act), 2004, and the offences
in counts two or four are said to be contrary to and punishable under Section
14(1) of the same Act.
In counts five and six, the former governor was accused of conspiring
with others to induce Union Bank Plc and actually inducing the bank “with the
intent to defraud, to grant an overdraft facility of the sum of N2bn under the
false pretence of using the amount to augment salaries of the Bayelsa State
Government.”
The conspiracy offence in count five was said to be contrary to
provisions of section 8(a) of the Advanced Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related
Offences Act 2004 and punishable under section 1(3) of the same Act.
After the arraignment on Monday, Justice Chukwu granted bail to Sylva
on conditions and terms previously granted by the former trial judge.
The oral bail application by Sylva’s lawyer, Israel Olorundare (SAN),
was not opposed by the prosecuting counsel from Keyamo’s law firm, Mr. John
Ainetor.
Ainetor had only urged the court to grant the bail, if it was willing
to do so in terms that would secure the availability of the accused person in
court.
The court fixed May 25 for commencement of trial.
No comments:
Post a Comment