The IMF says it should be cheaper. Hedge funds think it has room to run. So what gives with the dollar?
Since the trade war between the world’s two largest economies erupted in March last year, the dollar has gained more than 3 percent against a basket of currencies.
The dollar’s strength,
however, does not
sit well with President Donald Trump, who has advocated for a weaker currency
to make U.S. exports more competitive. On Monday, the U.S. Treasury labeled
China a currency manipulator for allowing the yuan to weaken beyond a key
level.
Trump feels that U.S. trading
partners, the Chinese in particular, are all working frantically to keep their
currencies cheap to gain an edge in trade.
His rhetoric has led to
speculation that the U.S. government, through the Treasury, could intervene to
weaken the dollar by using the Exchange Stabilization Fund. That is seen as
unlikely. That fund has approximately $146 billion in reserves, according to Bank
of America Merrill Lynch, which may not be enough to have a significant impact
in a more than $5 trillion currency market.
Trump is not the only one who
believes the dollar should be weaker. The International Monetary Fund says the
dollar ought to be about 6-12 percent cheaper based on near-term economic
fundamentals, but structural issues such as the greenback’s position as the
global reserve currency make that unlikely.
But week after week, hedge
funds keep piling up bets that the dollar’s surge has further to run as the
world appears headed toward a trade-induced pause in growth if not outright
recession.
So who’s right? Here are the
arguments:
- Reuters.
No comments:
Post a Comment