The irony isn't lost on Fiona Maye, a London High Court
judge and the central character in Ian McEwan's aching, slice-of-interior-life
novel, The Children Act.
She presides over custody battles and high-profile divorces
- "greedy husbands versus greedy wives, maneuvering like nations at the
end of a war, grabbing from the ruins what spoils they could." But her own
childless marriage, 30 years of intimate coexistence, has broken apart with the
announcement from Jack, her husband, a professor of ancient history, that he
has found a young woman with whom he wants to have sex.
He's not asking to leave, he is not in love. He longs only
for one last fling. And Fiona wants none of it. It is too late for some kind of
open arrangement. Jack packs a bag. Fiona changes the locks. Against this
backdrop of muted dissolution, an urgent new case reaches Fiona's docket: Adam
Henry, 17, has leukemia and needs transfusions. The prognosis, if the hospital
gives him new blood, is good. But his parents are Jehovah's Witnesses. Their
beliefs prohibit transfusions, and the son, a dreamy-eyed poet, shares their
view. He is ready to die.
It is a difficult case, balancing issues of religious
freedom against the responsibilities of the family court - a secular body,
after all - to assure the well-being of minors, even minors nearing adulthood.
Fiona decides, after testimony from the father, from a social worker, from a
hematologist, to visit the boy herself, in the hospital. It is not a
characteristic move on her part, and it is this encounter, and the subsequent
contact between the boy and the judge, that are at the heart of McEwan's
solemn, sinewy tale.
Written with the cool precision that McEwan has long been
known for, The Children Act is not set against some roiling tableau,
like Atonement, nor is it a microscopic, fussy work, like On Chesil
Beach. It's at its best - and this is most of the time - when Fiona's
intellect and emotions are at play (and, often, at odds). McEwan burrows into
her psychology - her longings, regrets, sense of purpose, fragility.
Like the illustration of the drop of blood on the dust
jacket, The Children Act is emblematic; it speaks to issues of faith and
free thought, of relationships defined by life and by loss. But McEwan hardly
ever loses focus of what matters most: this woman, with her rigorous mind, and
with a heart that may, or may not, withstand the crushing pressure of love.
No comments:
Post a Comment