The decision comes after a lawsuit first filed in 2012 in which Apple
claimed Samsung was using some of its technology without proper
permission.
That case was decided in May 2014 when Apple was awarded $120m (£76m) damages.
Apple
appealed, saying Samsung should stop selling phones using the disputed
features. Judges disagreed but this latest ruling overturns that
decision.
Damages decision
Apple's
bid to stop Samsung selling some handsets was initially denied because
the judges overseeing the case said the company had not demonstrated it
had suffered significant harm from the infringement.
Now, two of the three judges reviewing the case have said Apple deserves an injunction to stop Samsung selling some phones.
However,
this does not mean that Samsung will be forced to stop selling phones
that use the disputed technology. The ruling means the case returns to
the lower district court which will decide on whether an injunction is
appropriate.
It is not clear what impact the ruling will have on
Samsung because it only covers phones, such as the Galaxy S3, that were
sold in 2012 and have now largely disappeared from shop shelves. In
addition, Samsung has updated the software on its handsets so newer
models do not use the disputed features.
"Apple
has won every round," Prof Michael Risch from the Villanova University
School of Law told Reuters. "But the reality is it hasn't actually
slowed Samsung down."
Samsung said the decision would not stop it selling its flagship handsets and added that the decision was "unfounded".
"We will pursue our rights to have the full Court of Appeal review today's decision," it said in a statement.
For
its part, Apple repeated a statement it made early in the case in which
it accused Samsung of "wilfully" stealing its technology.
At
issue were Apple patents covering autocorrect software, sliding a finger
on a screen to unlock a phone and ways to turn text into hyperlinks.
Apple
and Samsung have faced each other in court many times over technology
patents they own. In late 2014, the two firms agreed to drop all the
patent cases being fought outside the US.
Still at issue is a 2012
decision in a separate case that initially awarded Apple more than $1bn
in damages for Samsung's use of its patented technologies. Subsequent
legal hearings reduced the damages to $930m but Samsung has appealed
against this revised figure.
No comments:
Post a Comment