London (CNN) -- More than six decades ago, the European Movement's founder Jean
Monnet shared his vision for the region's nascent union, prescribing money as a
means to heal the wounds left by two world wars.
"The fusion" of Europe's economic
ties, he said, would compel its nations "to fuse their sovereignty"
as well "into that of a single European state."
To the Frenchman, a federal Europe was the
natural progression of the bloc's newfound stability.
A collection of like-minded countries whose
shared goals were so clear they would willingly surrender their own governments
for the group's greater good.
That was 1952. A time when the future held
great promise after the horrors of the past and anything seemed possible --
even creating a new pseudo country. A place now known as the European Union.
Fast forward to the present day and, though
the EU does have some shared organs of government, like a commission and
parliament, it certainly isn't the set of "united states" Monnet
hoped for. Ones with the same deep-seated convictions and beliefs.
The glue holding their common ideologies together came unstuck with the fall of
the Berlin Wall.
Since then, a crisis among countries sharing
the euro has reopened old wounds. Ironically, instead of bringing nations
together, their finances have threatened to tear them apart.
This leaves us with one fundamental question:
if the EU's main task is no longer to provide peace, and it can't guarantee
prosperity either, then what should its role be?
Born from the ashes of Europe's turbulent
past, the EU has accomplished much for its members.
It has taught its citizens value of
compromise over violence, providing protection and strength in numbers.
It has boosted prosperity, thanks to the free
flow of goods and labor brought about by the single market, while consumer and
workers' rights have been reinforced and their health improved thanks to bans
on smoking.
But the EU has also drifted far from its
original concept, its ranks swollen by a massive Brussels-based bureaucratic
machine which, critics say, is stifling industry and is pushing members like
the UK towards the exit door.
The bloc's borders have doubled with its
endless absorption of former communist countries, stretching the definition of
Europe to its limits, making membership to this formerly elite club appear more
like a handy foreign policy tool rather than a cherished vision.
The EU faces a constant challenge living up
to the expectations of its citizens and without two-tier policies it has no
hope of serving both the bloc's strong and weak economies alike.
The EU needs a new vision a new project its
people can feel passionate about.
And where better to start then this week's
pivotal parliamentary elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment