Hospitality experts across the country have decried the rate at which hotel owners terminate existing franchise deals and move to new managers without considering the impact of such actions on the hospitality industry at large.
In the last five years over 20 hotels have changed their
brand names, management and operation style, an action which most
experts say confuses guests.
They further say such widespread franchise cross-
carpeting by hotels in Nigeria could lead big international hotel brands
to lose faith in the Nigerian hospitality sector.
Experts furthery question the rationale, especially when little or no change results from the new branding.
The experts observe that in the process of rebranding, the
hotels do not necessarily come out new, about 30 percent of the staff
are usually retrenched, those who remaining are not trained as promised
by the new management, while the new managements come with their key
staff who end up earning far more than the existing staff.
According to Andy Uganwa, a hospitality consultant, most
indigenous hotel owners are after quick returns on their investments,
and therefor seek hotel brands and management companies that will
collect cheap franchise or management fees, but deliver more profit at the end of the month.
“You can recall that UPDC contracted Novotel to restore,
brand and manage a hotel for them in Lagos, but surprisingly, the hotel
was opened as Golden Tulip Festac. It means that the Golden Tulip brand
probably bargained for a cheaper management, fee unlike Novotel.
“Le Meridien left Eko Hotel also because of management
issues, as well. At the opening of Golden Tulip Ibadan, the towels and
doormats were branded Protea, meaning that Protea furnished but could
not manage because of disagreement over fees.
“That is also why African Sun left Amber Tinapa Hotel
which is now (unbranded as) Tinapa Lakeside Hotel. There are many
instances”, he stressed.
Tunji Omonuwa, a hotel manager, said more hotels will be
rebranding soon, especially now that banks are going tough with their
debtors, including hoteliers.
“If a hotelier is under pressure to repay or service the
loan he obtained from the bank to build a hotel, he will also seek ways
to cut cost and make most of the profit. Of course, he may engage the
services of a cheaper brand, hence hotel names can change anytime”,
Omonuwa said.
Besides, the pressure of repaying bank loans, Omonuwa
noted that hoteliers can go for cheaper brands when they cannot compete
fiercely with other brands, hence the only option remaining for them to
stay in business is to rebrand.
“When the owners of Protea Oakwood discovered that
competition has brought more hotels around their vicinity, they
disengaged the Protea brand and remained Oakwood Hotel”, he noted saying
many hotels may be going the same way soon.
However, Nick Moore, a reviewer for TripAdvisor, noted
that the quest to get more franchise fees has made some international
hotel brands to go for any hotelier and property, as long as franchise
fees, salaries and allowances of their expatriate staff are paid.
Moore however said this negative development is usually at
the expense of quality and standard, as the management company looksthe
other way when guests complain, and rather will push it to the owners
who then start scouting for other managers.
OBINNA EMELIKE
No comments:
Post a Comment