EVEN as Brexit, a contentious presidential race in the US and turmoil
in emerging markets highlight fear among electorates, Unilever CEO Paul
Polman says consumers and investors are increasingly attracted to
brands that positively address social issues.

The UK’s vote to
leave the EU mirrors support for Donald Trump’s US presidential
candidacy in that both represent people "running away from something"
rather than supporting a particular policy or issue, Polman says in an
interview in London.
Political upheaval in Brazil, another key market for consumer goods
companies such as Unilever, has added to marketers’ concerns.
Brexit
is manageable and the Bank of England’s rate cut in August limited
potential economic fallout, Polman says. Despite the uncertainty, UK
Prime Minister Theresa May should not rush to trigger exit talks, he
adds.
"Uncertainty doesn’t help us, but … buying some time and
waiting for the UK to start the [Brexit] process is actually better" as
it allows time for politicians to "cool down", he says.
While
Brexit and the US election campaign have fed political cynicism and
populist rhetoric, Polman says consumers and investors are more attuned
to corporate social responsibility, the signature issue of his
eight-year tenure at the maker of Dove soaps and Ben & Jerry’s ice
cream.
Brands such as Dove that address societal or environmental
problems have grown 30% faster than the rest of Unilever’s business,
which spans 190 countries and generated €53bn in sales in 2015, the
company says. Such growth has assuaged sceptical investors who used to
prefer that CEOs battle industry rivals, not climate change. BlackRock
CEO Larry Fink has asked investors to focus more on the "real and
quantifiable financial impacts" of environmental and social factors such
as reducing carbon emissions and increasing diversity.
Ethical
investing has grown to encompass 30% of assets under management, or more
than $21-trillion, according to the Global Sustainable Investment
Alliance.
"If you ask the investor community how much they care
about environmental, social and governance issues, they will say we care
a lot about it, because they see that Volkswagen wipes off 40% of its
market cap, they see BP, they see Sports Direct," Polman says, referring
to cheating on emissions tests at Volkswagen, BP’s Gulf of Mexico oil
spill in 2010 and concerns over working practices at UK retailer Sports
Direct International.
Aside from sustainability, Polman has new
opportunities and old challenges on his plate. In July he paid about
$1bn for mail-order razor company Dollar Shave Club, with the hope that
Unilever can expand it beyond the US and apply its direct-to-consumer
subscription model to premium brands like Dermalogica skin care.
Asked
why he did not buy Dollar Shave earlier for a lower price, Polman says
the business was not sufficiently developed. By waiting until it had
more than $100m in sales, "you ensure that what you buy has a higher
probability to succeed".
Unilever’s food-spread business, which
includes Flora margarine and became a standalone subsidiary in 2014,
continues to struggle. Polman put a new executive in charge in January
and says he will look at all options if it fails to revive in 2016. Any
change in ownership would have to deliver value for shareholders and
result in a better-run business, he says.
"You could give it away
and destroy shareholder value or you can make the most of it. And if you
can make the most of it and convince yourself that there is someone
else out there that can do it better than we do, you have to give them
that opportunity. But if you sit on a declining business, that in itself
is not a reason to jump ship."
Polman has jettisoned brands that
failed to appeal to many consumers in the emerging markets that account
for 58% of Unilever revenue.
The Dutch executive wants to focus on
brands that can create online communities highlighting social issues
that interest millennial shoppers. In the US, those consumers spend a
collective $600bn annually, according to professional services company
Accenture.
Dove, for example, has worked to improve young women’s
self-esteem by discussing conceptions of beauty, while Lifebuoy soap has
sought to raise awareness of the importance of hand-washing. Companies
that cannot or will not address issues like climate change are
struggling, he says. "Brands that have a stronger purpose are the brands
that do better."
No comments:
Post a Comment