I have followed with keen interest the controversy over the
announcement of cut-off marks for Nigeria’s admission processes for the
2017/2018 session, with many commentators and the general public
insisting that it is unwise, insensitive and retrogressive, to reduce
the cut off mark for admissions into our tertiary institutions: 120 for
universities, 100 for polytechnics and monotechnics, and a tentative 110
for Innovative Enterprise Institutions (IEIs). Whereas the complaint
has been that there is a dumbing down and lowering of standards, which
is of course an obvious reaction, I argue that there is need for a
better understanding of the context in which the decision was taken in
the hope that this would shed some light on this controversial matter.
I write as a reporter and as a stakeholder who attended the 2017/2018
Policy Meeting on plans and modalities for the conduct of admissions
into tertiary institutions in Nigeria at the Andrews Otutu Obaseki
Auditorium, National Judicial Institute in Abuja, on August 22. The
meeting started on Sunday, August 20, 2017. On Monday, August 21, there
was a special session for admissions officers of all tertiary
institutions in Nigeria. There are 524 tertiary institutions in Nigeria
(minus the IEIs) and every institution was represented on Monday and
again on Tuesday, when a special policy session was held and decisions
were taken at a combined session of Registrars and Vice Chancellors,
Provosts and Rectors. The Obaseki Auditorium was filled up at this
meeting, which was attended by over 1, 600 stakeholders in the education
sector. In other words, it was a meeting of stakeholders and the
decisions were decisions taken by all tertiary institutions in Nigeria.
It is therefore wrong to accuse JAMB or report that it is JAMB that is
fixing cut-off marks for university admissions.
I recall that at the meeting, when we were about to go into the
policy making session, the Minister of Education had to excuse himself
on the ground that he had other commitments; all JAMB officials were
also asked to leave the hall. The JAMB Registrar explained that he
wanted the heads of tertiary institutions to be the ones to take the
decisions, not JAMB, not the Minister, and he didn’t want either the
Minister or his own staff in attendance so nobody would turn around to
accuse JAMB or the Ministry of Education of imposing decisions on the
tertiary institutions.
There were other stakeholders in attendance, the heads of the
National University Commission (NUC), TETFUND, the National Board for
Technical Education (NBTE), National Commission for Colleges of
Education (NCCE), NECO, NYSC and the West African Examinations Council
(WAEC) – all as observers. The heads of IEIs stayed away from this
particular meeting because they had earlier informed JAMB that the heads
of other tertiary institutions are in the habit of out-voting and
outnumbering them at policy meetings and they would rather have their
own separate meeting to serve their own interests. I concluded, there
and then, that students’ admission into tertiary institutions in Nigeria
has become big business and politics, with stiff competition between
public and private institutions.
This clarification is necessary because as I see it, some of the
participants in that meeting have since gone on a holier-than-thou
expedition to distance themselves from it. At the meeting, the JAMB
Registrar repeatedly pointed out that the University of Ibadan had made
it clear that its cut-off mark would never go below 200. There are other
universities like that, including the University of Nigeria, Nsukka,
and the University of Ilorin. I am surprised however that there has been
so much uncomfortable hypocrisy from some universities that attended
the meeting. The Vice Chancellor and the Registrar of the Afe Babalola
University, Ado-Ekiti were both in attendance and the former spoke
enthusiastically in support of the decisions. Yes, the ABUAD VC was
there, but curiously, his employer, the proprietor and founder of the
Afe Babalola University was the first person to denounce the decisions.
We should take special notice however, of the intervention of the Vice
Chancellor of the Tai Solarin University of Education, Professor
Oluyemisi Obilade, and Professor Femi Mimiko. Out of over 1, 600
participants at a policy meeting, only two persons are standing up to
report the truth?
The objectives of that policy meeting were inter alia, to brief the
Degree, National Certificate in Education and National Diploma-awarding
institutions on the plans and modalities for the conduct of the
2017/2018 admissions exercise, introduce the Central Admissions
Processing System (CAPS), seek the cooperation and understanding of
stakeholders, discuss and agree on submissions of estimated intakes and
compliance with the current prescribed quota from the NUC, NCCE, and
NBTE, adherence to institutional/programmes cut off marks, compliance
with entry requirements, procedure for selection of candidates who may
not be admitted at their first choice institutions, adherence to
admissions schedule as approved at the Policy meeting and implementation
of the science-arts ratio. These issues were tabled, discussed, voted
upon and decisions were taken. The states and private tertiary
institutions were exempted from the last criteria, to be determined by
their proprietors.
It is important to understand the three main backgrounds to this
policy meeting. At a similar policy meeting held on June 2, 2016, the
various stakeholders at this same 2017 meeting, had adopted 180 as the
minimum cut-off mark for admissions to all tertiary institutions in
Nigeria. The regulator’s subsequent discovery is that most of the
tertiary institutions did not respect this decision. They admitted
students who scored below 180 and never reported same to JAMB; they
introduced all kinds of back-door schemes and programmes under which
admissions were offered.
In effect, the admissions process into Nigerian tertiary institutions
was compromised; standards were violated. JAMB therefore decided that
every institution must declare a lowest cut off point for its programmes
and that every admission must be properly reported and documented, and
brought to the notice of the regulator in order to enforce standards and
have accurate statistics for educational planning. I got the impression
for example, that some higher institutions must have been admitting all
kinds of persons who did not have basic qualifications and never passed
through the central admissions body. It is curious, isn’t it, that the
same schools that voted for 180 in 2016, are now asking for 120, 110 and
100?
Secondly, the evidence was provided to the effect that many tertiary
institutions do not respect the admission quota in line with the Federal
Character prescribed by the Constitution. Most universities simply
admit students from their catchment areas and ignore students from other
parts of the country. Bayero University, to cite a notable example,
admits over 50% of its students from Kano state, and yet it is a Federal
University. Even when students from other parts of the country who
apply to such universities have high, qualifying scores, they are
ignored.
Thus, every year, many qualified students from different parts of the
country are left stranded. They miss the opportunity to go to
university not because they are not qualified, but because they have
been shut out by the politicization of education in Nigeria. To correct
this mischief, JAMB has now created a second tier admissions platform
called the Central Admissions Processing System (CAPS). It is an
admissions-market where students who have been rejected by their first
choices can seek alternatives, where JAMB can help rejected candidates
seek other offers, and every institution can go in search of qualified
candidates who may have been rejected elsewhere. This is to help
increase the admissions ratio in the country, reduce the politicization
of admissions, check the exodus of Nigerian students to foreign
universities, create more opportunities and ensure greater equity. The
only ouster clause in this arrangement is that at the end of the day,
the candidate is free to reject any offer that he or she does not find
acceptable, and that has no limit whatsoever.
JAMB in its explanation further recognized that ordinarily, a school
certificate result should be enough requirement for admission to
tertiary institutions as is the case in many countries of the world. In
order to raise standards, Nigeria has a system whereby secondary school
graduates still have to sit for UTME conducted by JAMB and Post-UTME,
further testing conducted by the tertiary institutions, and confront
other unwritten hurdles. The higher education seeker in Nigeria is thus
taken through greater rigour than similar applicants elsewhere. In 2016,
the Policy Meeting on Admissions had banned further conduct of the
Post-UTME to reduce the burden faced by Nigerian students. At the 2017
meeting however, the Minister of Education, Mallam Adamu Adamu lifted
the ban, noting that the tertiary institutions deserve the independence
they have always asked for over their admissions process.
Indeed, this was the main point of the August 22 meeting. Tertiary
institutions in Nigeria are the ones to determine their own admissions
process. Cut off marks are to be fixed by the Senate of each
institution, not JAMB. What JAMB has created through the CAPS is an open
market that empowers admission-seekers, promotes healthy competition
and provides an avenue for students to raise queries when they feel they
may have been short-changed. The insistence on reporting is to aid
transparency and data collection, we were told.
If this works, in no time, every tertiary institution will establish
its own brand equity. As is the case elsewhere, the labour market in
Nigeria will soon begin to differentiate between the students who
graduated from a school that admits with 100 over 400 marks and another
school whose cut off mark is as high as 250, in the same manner in which
there is a marked difference in the UK between a graduate of
Metropolitan University and a graduate of the Universities of Oxford and
Cambridge. This differentiation in quality and standards is perhaps
long-needed in the Nigerian education market.
That is as far as the meeting went, and the report of what I saw and
heard. My real concern, and a probable justification for the outcry over
the reduction of cut–off marks below the average score is, however,
traceable to the fact that Nigeria’s education system is now terribly
commercialized and unequal. The law of supply and demand is probably at
the root of the politics of cut-off marks. We have more than 524
institutions looking not for students but customers! Ordinarily, most
students want to attend elite schools and the Federal institutions,
which charge subsidized fees. For instance, Federal Universities charge
as low as N35, 000, the state universities about N150, 000-N200, 000,
and the private universities as much as N750, 000.
The competition for space in the schools with lower fees is much
higher, often leaving the ones with expensive school fees with fewer
applicants. While the more economically attractive schools can afford to
have high cut off marks, it is not impossible that lower cut-off marks
would attract more students to the less patronized schools! The
implication is not far to seek. Beyond the policy meeting of August 22,
and all expressed good intentions, and regardless of the choice of the
stakeholders, therefore, JAMB’s next and biggest challenge, in my view,
is to ensure that market forces do not ultimately subvert quality and
standards in the tertiary education sector. It is also up to parents to
determine the kind of school that they want their children to attend,
and for every institution to choose between mediocrity and excellence.
No comments:
Post a Comment