Nigeria’s economy is set face more pressure amid
falling oil prices and dwindling revenue, as the Economic Community
of West African States (ECOWAS) implements the Common External Tariff (CET)
regime this month.
The continued dependence on oil as the main
foreign exchange earner, poor
capacity in the manufacturing sector and ineffective anti-dumping measures,
among others, are likely to undermine Nigeria at the take-off of the project,
which is aimed at uplifting the economy of the region.
With uniform tariffs, revenue accruing to the
Federal Government through the Nigeria Customs Service(NCS), which reached N3
trillion in 44 months preceding September 2014 and N977 billion between January
and December 2014 , will likely plunge, according to analysts. This will put
more pressure on the economy which depends on oil, whose price has already
fallen to below $50 per barrel, about $15 less than Nigeria’s budget benchmark
of $65.
Nigeria depends on oil for 75 percent of
budget and 95 percent of foreign exchange earnings.
“There is a likelihood that revenue could
fall, though I know a few measures are in place to ensure no country loses
out,” said Tunde Oyelola, vice-chairman, PZ Cussons Nigeria plc.
The manufacturing sector and non-oil exports
will be worst hit, as the twin sectors suffer from significant lack of
competitiveness. While many sub-sectors in manufacturing have low capacity,
non-oil export is mainly dominated by raw agricultural commodities, rather than
finished manufactured goods, stakeholders say. For the CET regime, countries
that do not have strong manufacturing base may lose out, as they will only
become dumping grounds for other
economies in the sub-region.
Stakeholders say this could affect output,
employment and capacity utilisation in manufacturing.
Frank Jacobs, president, Manufacturers
Association of Nigeria (MAN), said the implementation of cross-border policies
such as the Common External Tariff (CET) and Economic Partnership Agreement
(EPA) could throw up fresh challenges that might further complicate the current
lacklustre performance of the country’s manufacturing sector.
According to Jacobs, who spoke during the
43rd annual general meeting of the MAN Apapa branch, held in Lagos, the CET and
the EPA regimes would challenge the Nigerian economy, particularly the
manufacturing sector, as local markets would be flooded with products made under
favourable business environments at relatively lower prices.
The fear of real sector players is that CET
will create an avenue for the adoption of the EPA, which is a trade
liberalisation agreement between ECOWAS and the European Union.
Under the EPA agreement, 75 percent of the West African market will be gradually be
liberalised in favour of the EU export products over the next 20 years.
The EU is contributing up to 6.5 million
Euros to support development programmes in West African countries during the
first five years of EPA implementation.
The fear of manufacturers is that EPA will
open the door to an influx of European products which will box local
commodities to a corner. Stakeholders thus see EPA as an agreement between two
unequal halves.
Babatunde Odunayo, chairman, MAN, Apapa
branch, said the EPA could lead to revenue loss of $1.3 trillion to the Federal
Government, while the country stands the risk of being flooded with European
products. Odunayo said adopting CET or EPA like other West African
countries, would require the government finding a way of imposing special
levies on certain products to protect certain industries.
Ademola Oyejide, chairman, the Centre for
Trade and Development Initiatives (CTDI), recently said the government should
establish mitigating measures, such as anti-dumping laws, labour market
reforms, technological support to private firms to improve ability to compete,
social safety nets to compensate displaced workers, and tax reforms to increase collection efficiency and
the tax base.
ODINAKA ANUDU
No comments:
Post a Comment